The Clearbit alternative,
rebuilt for 2026.
Clearbit was the default enrichment layer for a decade — domains, logos, and firmographics in one key. With the API sunset, teams still need the same jobs done: know who a company is from a domain, keep data fresh, and avoid stitching five vendors.
Orsa
4
net-new capabilities
Clearbit
10
rows compared
Decision note
If you need company identity, brand assets, and web context from domains and URLs, Orsa is the modern replacement path.
Start free, no card required, most teams ship a first integration in under ten minutes.
The honest version,
before the table
A comparison page should help a buyer decide, not pretend every competitor is useless. These pages now lead with the trade-off.
Teach the switch,
then make the table useful
Teams comparing Clearbit need to understand the migration shape: what to replace first, what to keep, and where Orsa expands the workflow.
Clearbit workflow
If you still need person-level enrichment, you will use specialized vendors — Orsa is not a contact database.
Replace the narrow API call
Start with the matching Orsa endpoint, verify response fields, and keep your product behavior stable.
Add web context
If you need company identity, brand assets, and web context from domains and URLs, Orsa is the modern replacement path.
- Competitor
- ClearbitIf you still need person-level enrichment, you will use specialized vendors — Orsa is not a contact database.
- Orsa advantage
- 4 net-new capabilitiesMeasured from the comparison table below.
- Migration code
- Endpoint docsStart with the closest Orsa endpoint.
- Best next step
- Test on your own dataUse one real domain, URL, or transaction descriptor before expanding scope.
Where Orsa replaces,
and where it expands
The table is still here, but it now sits inside a real landing page for teams evaluating Clearbit.
A comparison page
should lower migration risk
The point is not “Clearbit is bad.” The point is that Orsa covers the neighboring jobs teams usually bolt on after the first integration.
- Start with a narrow replacement for the current vendor call.
- Keep the developer path visible with migration code and SDK examples.
- Show the expansion path into brand data, web extraction, classification, and workflows.
What changes when
you choose Orsa
The table tells you what exists. These sections tell you why the difference matters to the product team.
Scope
Orsa: If you need company identity, brand assets, and web context from domains and URLs, Orsa is the modern replacement path.Clearbit: If you still need person-level enrichment, you will use specialized vendors — Orsa is not a contact database.
Migration path
Orsa: Most teams can replace the narrow vendor call first, then add adjacent Orsa endpoints as the workflow expands.Clearbit: Clearbit can still make sense when the job is narrow and already working.
Choose Clearbit when
The narrow job is working and staying narrow.
If you still need person-level enrichment, you will use specialized vendors — Orsa is not a contact database.
Choose Orsa when
The workflow needs context, not another point API.
If you need company identity, brand assets, and web context from domains and URLs, Orsa is the modern replacement path.
“The Clearbit shutdown was going to cost us three engineering weeks. Orsa's migration guide got us there in a day.”
— Dev Patel, Senior Engineer · Mintlify
Ready to compare
with your own data?
Replace one Clearbit workflow with Orsa and see where the broader context layer helps next.
One API key for every Orsa endpoint · No card required to start.